| "Our art—our music,
dances, paintings, literature, sculpture, and buildings—reflects
a nation born of high ideals: freedom, justice, and
equality. We are a nation sustained by the idealism,
diversity, and above all, the creativity of our people." |
|
Bill Ivey,
Former Chairperson
National Endowment for the Arts |
The National Endowment for the Arts
(NEA), was established by the National Foundation on the Arts and
the Humanities act of 1965, Title 20, United States Code 951. The
NEA’s function is to award federal grants to support the arts.
In the Section 951
"Declaration of Findings and Purpose", Congress finds
and declares the following:
(1) The arts and the
humanities belong to all the people of the United States.
(2) The
encouragement and support of national progress and scholarship
in the humanities and the arts, while primarily a matter for
private and local initiative, are also appropriate matters of
concern to the Federal Government.
(3) An advanced
civilization must not limit its efforts to science and
technology alone, but must give full value and support to the
other great branches of scholarly and cultural activity in order
to achieve a better understanding of the past, a better analysis
of the present, and a better view of the future.
(4) Democracy
demands wisdom and vision in its citizens. It must therefore
foster and support a form of education, and access to the arts
and the humanities, designed to make people of all backgrounds
and wherever located masters of their technology and not its
unthinking servants.
(5) It is necessary
and appropriate for the Federal Government to complement,
assist, and add to programs for the advancement of the
humanities and the arts by local, State, regional, and private
agencies and their organizations. In doing so, the Government
must be sensitive to the nature of public sponsorship. Public
funding of the arts and humanities is subject to the conditions
that traditionally govern the use of public money. Such funding
should contribute to public support and confidence in the use of
taxpayer funds. Public funds provided by the Federal Government
must ultimately serve public purposes the Congress defines.
(6) The arts and the
humanities reflect the high place accorded by the American
people to the nation's rich cultural heritage and to the
fostering of mutual respect for the diverse beliefs and values
of all persons and groups.
(7) The practice of
art and the study of the humanities require constant dedication
and devotion. While no government can call a great artist or
scholar into existence, it is necessary and appropriate for the
Federal Government to help create and sustain not only a climate
encouraging freedom of thought, imagination, and inquiry but
also the material conditions facilitating the release of this
creative talent.
(8) The world
leadership which has come to the United States cannot rest
solely upon superior power, wealth, and technology, but must be
solidly founded upon worldwide respect and admiration for the
Nation's high qualities as a leader in the realm of ideas and of
the spirit.
(9) Americans should
receive in school, background and preparation in the arts and
humanities to enable them to recognize and appreciate the
aesthetic dimensions of our lives, the diversity of excellence
that comprises our cultural heritage, and artistic and scholarly
expression.
(10) It is vital to
a democracy to honor and preserve its multicultural artistic
heritage as well as support new ideas, and therefore it is
essential to provide financial assistance to its artists and the
organizations that support their work.
(11) To fulfill its
educational mission, achieve an orderly continuation of free
society, and provide models of excellence to the American
people, the Federal Government must transmit the achievement and
values of civilization from the past via the present to the
future, and make widely available the greatest achievements of
art.
(12) In order to
implement these findings and purposes, it is desirable to
establish a National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.
Mission
The National Endowment of the Arts mission is to "nurture the
expression of human creativity, support the cultivation of community spirit, and foster the recognition and appreciation of
the excellence
and diversity of our nation’s artistic
accomplishments." Federal funded arts range from sculptures
to dances, and from murals to orchestras. Federal money is used
for many purposes in order to support the arts. There are many
agendas that the funding helps serve in the arts.
Art Education
The NEA supports art education. Studies have shown that engagement
and persistence in students improve with an arts-based curriculum.
The arts have been shown to help understanding of different
cultures, and can aid students for finding jobs. Research shows
that visual imagery in the study of art helps students
understanding of mathematical concepts. Learning strategies
through those who learn the arts can be applied to other subjects.
School music programs have seen results such as students increased
self-discipline, self-esteem, teamwork, pride of accomplishment,
creative thinking and leadership. The NEA funds programs that
teach art and art education.
Communities Large and Small
The endowment brings art to those who would not have readable
access to it. The NEA set a minimum of 400,000 dollars to be
allocated to each state. The NEA wants to increase access to the
arts for communities outside the major art centers. One third of
the NEA’s direct grants go to New York, Boston, San Francisco,
Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington. The NEA also provides grants
to small and medium-size cities that would not have enough money
to fund projects and programs on their own. Public art agencies in
both small towns and cities have increased to 3,800.
Diversity
Grants made by the NEA back programs that stress the value of art
as both national and international cultural exchanges. The arts
are important in cultural exchanges. "Art conveys information
about ourselves and our universe which can be found nowhere
else," said Walter Cutler, president of the Meridian
International Center in Washington D.C. Art helps people
communicate and increases intercultural understanding. According
to the NEA, more than 170 different ethnic groups in the United
States, learned about their and others unique cultures from
expanded access to international activities.
The Power of Leverage
The National Endowment for the Arts grants prove to be catalysts
for private donations. According to the American Arts Alliance,
"Last year (1994), $123 million in NEA grants leveraged more
than $1.3 billion." Every NEA dollar is matched at least 100
percent from local and state agencies, corporations foundations
and individuals. The NEA’s approval is seen to be a stamp of
excellence and increases private support. "An NEA grant is
like giving an artist the Good Housekeeping seal of
approval," says William Nolan, chairman of the Florida Arts
Council. Grants from the government can get an artist or
organization attention it needs to be funded from other sources.
Politics and the Budget
Tying down federal funds for the arts has been under scrutiny for
a long time. In the middle of the debate are the issues of
obscenity and government censorship over federally funded artwork.
Some people believe that the obscenity issue is just a smoke
screen by those who would like to end funding altogether.
The National Endowment for the Arts
has seen a significant drop in its budget. Prior to 1996, the NEA’s
budget was around $160 million. In 1996 to now, the budget has
been under $100 million. In the past year, all initiatives to
raise and lower the current $98 million dollar budget have failed.
The United States spends about thirty-six cents per capita to fund
the NEA. The NEA budget is one one-hundredths of one percent of
the federal government’s budget. Our major allies including
England, France and Germany have a budget for the arts fifty times
ours. Nationally, non-profit arts create $37 billion in economic
activity and support over one million jobs. The NEA has been
reprimanded for giving a fifth of its grants to organizations and
museums that already have multibillion-dollar budgets, and for
using nineteen percent of its budget for administration.
"Americans for the most part
are moral, decent people and they have a right not to be
denigrated, offended, or mocked with their own tax dollars,"
Senator Jesse Helms said on a speech on the floor of the Senate,
July 26, 1989. His objections came then for allowing federal
funding of a Robert Mapplethorne exhibition he said was
homoerotic. Funding art that some deem obscene has been under
constant analysis. The NEA itself deems whether or not something
is obscene. The most current battle over federal funding for works
said to be obscene is the Brooklyn Museum of Art’s exhibit
"Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi
Collection." This collection features a painting of the
Virgin Mary smeared with elephant dung, a maggot-ridden cow’s
head, and a sliced pig. New York mayor Rudy Giuliani hated the
exhibition so much that he doesn’t want anyone else to see it.
Giuliani has inspired a lawsuit to cut funding against the
Brooklyn Museum. The museum received over $200,000 from the
federal government and $7 million in city funding in 1999. The
Brooklyn Museum has made its case against Giuliani by saying that
the first amendment, the freedom of speech, protects art against
political retaliation.
The Arts and Democracy
"If you study the history of the NEA, the effectiveness of
its matching formulas, the resultant increase in the numbers of
orchestras, opera companies, theatres, community art centers,
museums and all the rest, you will reach the inescapable
conclusion that the endowment has been, and is, essential to our
cultural growth—and to democracy, one of whose hallmarks stems
from the variety and potential of it creative expression,"
wrote Livingston Biddie, a former chairman of the NEA. A 1996 poll
said sixty-one percent of Americans said they would pay five
dollars more in taxes to fund the arts. The NEA’s grants support
America's arts. The endowment has helped develop arts in America as
well as making them available to a wider audience.
Notwithstanding the
politics and controversies, the NEA has shown itself to be
essential for cultural growth, democracy and creative
expression in America.
© 1999-2006, Luke
Hetherman
|
References
and Related Material
NEA
Website
Livingston Biddie,
"The NEA: Cultural Essential," The Washington
Post, 6 March 1999, (A)19.
Arthur C. Brooks, "Do
public subsides leverage private philanthropy for the
arts?," Nonprofit and Voluntary sector
Quarterly 28 no.1 (March 1999): 32-45.
Bernard Cesarone,
"Benefits of art and music education," Childhood
Education 76 no.1 (Fall 1999); 52.
David Cole, "The
Culture War; When the Government is a Critic," The
Los Angeles Times, 3 October 1999, record edition 1.
Paul Greenburg, "NEA
Emphasizes Not People’s Art but an Elite’s," Conservative
Chronicle, (August 1997).
Mona Khademi, "The
importance of international cultural exchanges: Some
normative considerations," Journal of Arts
Management, Law and Society 29 no.1 (spring 1999):
47-51.
Sean Paige, "Taxpayers
fund the Brooklyn museum of shock art," Insight on
the News 15 no.41 (November 1999) 47.
Editorial Research Reports,
ed. Marcus D. Rosenbaum. Washington D.C.: Congressional
Quarterly Inc., 1990, 302-313.
Jacqueline Trescott, "NEA
Makes Grants to Small Towns," The Washington Post,
9 September 1999, (C)5. |
| If you have
supporting or opposing views that you would like to
express, you may write to Luke Hetherman at Luke@Hetherman.com |
| Citation
Reference for this article: |
| Hetherman, L. (1999). The
National Endowment for the Arts: Essential for
cultural growth, democracy and creative
expression in America. burbankwire.com.
Retrieved (insert date) from
http://www.burbankwire.com/arts/nea.htm |
|
This URL: http://www.burbankwire.com/arts/nea.htm
Print this
article

www.burbankwire.com
|